Visualizing the Intersection of Engineering and Human Anatomy
In medical device litigation, the jury must understand not just that a device failed, but how and why it failed within the complex environment of the human body. Trial Graphics 360 provides high-fidelity 3D reconstructions that demonstrate mechanical failure, design defects, and the resulting clinical sequelae.
01
Engineering Precision Meets Clinical Reality
We specialize in "Exploded View" forensics—taking a device apart digitally to show the jury the internal mechanics that caused the injury.
Mechanical Failure & Fracture
We model material fatigue, stress fractures, and structural collapses in implants, from hip stems to spinal hardware.
Device Migration & Malposition
Using patient-specific DICOM data, we visualize exactly how a device migrated from its intended site to cause secondary organ or vascular damage.
Toxicology & Particulate Release
Visualizing the release of metallic debris or polymers (e.g., metallosis in metal-on-metal implants) and the inflammatory response in the surrounding tissue.
02
The Forensic Workflow: Data-Driven Modeling
We don't use "generic" device models. Our reconstructions are based on the actual specifications of the hardware involved in your case.
CAD & DICOM Integration
We can overlay the manufacturer's CAD (Computer-Aided Design) specifications onto the patient's DICOM scans to show exactly how the device fit—or failed to fit—within the patient’s unique anatomy.
Dynamic Failure Simulation
We animate the device in motion, showing how everyday physiological forces (walking, breathing, arterial pulse) contributed to the device’s failure over time.
Expert Validation: The Clinical Bridge
Dr. Kevin Ho’s background in Clinical Research (Harvard, Stanford, Sanofi) and his experience as a practicing clinician allow him to act as the bridge between your engineering experts and your medical experts.
01
Peer-Reviewed Accuracy
Our visualizations of device-tissue interaction are rooted in the same scientific rigor Dr. Ho applies to his published research in Nature npj Digital Medicine and Science Advances.
02
Standard of Care & IFU
We help you visualize whether the device was used according to the Instructions for Use (IFU) or if a design flaw made safe usage impossible.
Trusted by the World’s Leading Medical & Academic Institutions.
Visual & Medical Accuracy
Bridging the gap between complex medical data and jury comprehension through precision-engineered 3D visuals.
✳︎ Founded by scientifically published medical illustrators and legal strategy experts
$100M+
Total increase in settlement value for our clients across high-stakes litigation.
15Years
Years of experience in anatomical modeling and courtroom-admissible evidence.
Admissibility for Complex Technical Claims
Product liability cases are often won or lost on the jury’s ability to understand technical jargon. We turn that jargon into a clear, admissible narrative that withstands defense scrutiny.
Forensic Accuracy
Models built to scale based on actual device measurements.
Objective Foundation
Every frame is cross-referenced with the expert’s report and the physical evidence.
Visual Clarity
Simplifying complex engineering concepts without sacrificing scientific integrity.